Comparing erg theory and maslow s hierarchy

Although the basic premise of the Porter-Lawler model is the same as for Vroom's model, the Porter-Lawler model is more complex in a number of ways.

However, as illustrated in figure In addition, linkage to macro social organizational and political economic issues, such as social class, have also been proposed. Work upon utilizing your strengths and opportunities to neutralize and lower the negative impact of your weaknesses and organizational threats.

A smiling superior creates an optimistic and motivating work environment. Without an understanding of how to direct effort effectively, individuals may exert considerable effort without a corresponding increase in performance.

At a fundamental level, both of these theories fall under the umbrella of content theory of human motivation, with the basic assumptions that all people and situations are alike and that there is only best way to motivate people.

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development OECDhowever, draws a less hopeful picture of the reality of working life, pointing out that: Their valence, which is the extent to which the expected outcomes are attractive or unattractive.

Equity Theory of Motivation

There is little discussion of how either negative emotions, nor learning-based behaviour except for Bandura, above arise in common adult social situations. There are two types of inequity—under-reward and over-reward. Job stress has become a leading source of worker disability in North America and Europe.

The process theories are concerned with determining how individual behavior is energized, directed, and maintained in the specifically willed and self-directed human cognitive processes.

Maslow's Theory Vs. ERG

Finally, self-actualization needs are those corresponding to the achievement one's own potential, the exercising and testing of one's creative capacities, and, in general, to becoming the best person one can possibly be.

Only if higher-level needs motivators were met would individuals be motivated. ERG theory also suggests that if an individual is continually unable to meet upper-level needs that the person will regress and lower-level needs become the major determinants of their motivation.

Seven sources of contacts were identified by means of factor analysis: A person may change his or her level of effort; an employee who feels under-rewarded is likely to work less hard.

These referents are as follows: At the macro level, macro social occupational factors, such as worker collective and organizational level decision influence and support, communication limitations and job and income insecurity, need to be more clearly integrated into the model.

Applications of the hierarchy of needs to management and the workplace are obvious. Another major gender difference is the negative correlation between decision latitude and demands for women: The hypotheses were confirmed in both areas, although many confounding factors obviously share in these results.

Three of the primary needs in this theory are the need for affiliation n Affthe need for power n Powand the need for achievement n Ach.

What are the similarities and differences between the ERG Theory and Maslow’s Hierarchy?

Existence Needs co-relate to Maslow's first two levels. Another possible effect is that the employee, bent on raising output and earnings, infringes safety regulations thereby increasing the risk of occupational disease and of accidents to oneself and others e.

Be flexible- Introduce flexibility in work. This example illustrates the environmental programming involved in the way a worker reacts behaviourally, physiologically and socially, leading to increased vulnerability, impaired health and even death.

Need Hierarchies: A Comparison Of Maslow And Alderfer

By carefully handling these factors, an organization can avoid the dissatisfaction of its employees, but cannot satisfy or motivate them. The questionnaire was included in two of the annual Surveys of Living Conditions in Sweden, which were designed to assess and measure the welfare of the nation in material as well as in social and psychological terms.

So for the person in the FP mindset, the frustration of needs is deemed unacceptable, and this is what sets the person to move into this position. The goal-setting theory posits that goals are the most important factors affecting the motivation and behavior of employees. In the ISF, needs are recognized from within, and the environment is perceived as a facilitator in the meeting of those needs, so there is minimal frustration.

Others studied the effect of learning and how individuals base current behavior on the consequences of past behavior. For managers, equity theory emphasizes the importance of a reward system that is perceived as fair by employees.

Individuals try to fulfill these five levels of needs through a hierarchical order. The undesirable behavioural dynamic begins with the high-strain job, the high accumulated residual strain and the restricted capacity to accept learning challenges.

Physical needs include the need for air, water, food, and rest. Some researchers focused on internal drives as an explanation for motivated behavior.

Comparison of Maslow and Herzberg Theory of Motivation

Such factors can influence the worker both physically and chemically, for example, direct effects on the brain of organic solvents. In employment terms, people can achieve growth by learning new skills and earning promotions that increase personal satisfaction.

Sometimes it is difficult to determine whether stress in a particular situation is good or bad. The combined actions of both environmental stressors and low environmental control were essential elements in producing these effects.Need Hierarchies: A Comparison of Maslow and Alderfer Abstract This paper is an attempt to compare and contrast Maslow's hierarchy of needs with Alderfer ERG theory.

Maslow vs Herzberg Theory of Motivation Difference between Maslow and Herzberg theory of motivation is that, Maslow’s theory is concerned about different levels of needs which affect the motivation levels of the employees; Herzberg’s two factor theory is concerned about the relationship between the employee satisfaction and motivation.

Compare and contrast Maslow’s hierarchy of needs to Alderfer’s ERG theory. Both Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and Alderfer’s ERG theory are need-based theories. Maslow suggests there are five basic human needs: physiological, safety, social, esteem and self-actualization, which are arranged in a hierarchy%(56).

Employees are the building blocks of an organization. Organizational success depends on the collective efforts of the employees. The employees will collectively contribute to organizational growth when they are motivated. Evaluate yourself-In order to motivate, encourage and control your staff’s. The theory is a response and reaction to Maslow's famous "Hierarchy of Needs" theory, and reduces Maslow's 5 levels of need to just these 3 categories (Existence, Relatedness, and Growth).

Staff Motivation - Motivation Tips for Employees

Existence Needs co-relate to Maslow's first two levels. Comparison of Maslow and Herzberg Theory of Motivation shows the similarities and differences between the hierarchy of needs and two-factor theory. Maslow and Herzberg provided most popular human motivation theories that used in the workforce.

Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and Herzberg’s two Factor theory are compared and we try to find .

Download
Comparing erg theory and maslow s hierarchy
Rated 0/5 based on 81 review